Product Liability Lawyer In New Mexico

Key Terms in Product Liability

Strict Liability

Strict liability is a legal theory that allows an injured person to pursue compensation without proving the manufacturer or seller acted carelessly. Instead, the focus is on whether the product was unreasonably dangerous when it left the company’s control and whether that condition caused the injury. In practice, this often involves engineering analysis, testing, and industry standards to show that the product failed to perform as a reasonable consumer would expect. Strict liability encourages companies to design and build safe products, because responsibility can follow the defect rather than the conduct. Defenses may include product alteration or unforeseeable misuse.

Failure to Warn

A failure-to-warn claim alleges that a product lacked adequate instructions or warnings about non-obvious risks, making it unsafe for ordinary use. The question is whether the manufacturer knew or should have known of the danger and whether reasonable warnings could have reduced the risk. Labels, manuals, training materials, and marketing content are often examined to see what information was provided and how it was presented. Even a well-designed product can be dangerous without clear guidance. If a warning would not have made a difference because the hazard was obvious or the product was misused, the defense may challenge the claim.

Design Defect

A design defect exists when the blueprint of a product is unreasonably dangerous, meaning every unit made according to that design has the same hazard. These cases often evaluate whether a safer, practical alternative design was available at the time, considering cost, feasibility, and overall utility. Evidence can include expert testing, industry standards, and records from similar products or prior incidents. To succeed, a claimant generally must show that the design created a foreseeable risk and that this defect caused the injury. Manufacturers may argue that proposed alternatives would reduce performance or raise costs in ways that make the product impractical.

Manufacturing Defect

A manufacturing defect occurs when a particular product departs from its intended design due to errors during production, assembly, or quality control. Unlike a design defect, the blueprint may be safe, but the specific item is flawed because of contamination, misassembly, or substandard materials. Proving this claim often involves comparing the failed product to design specifications and other units from the same batch. Quality records, supplier documentation, and retention samples can be important. If the flaw existed when the product left the manufacturer and caused the injury, liability may follow. The defense may argue later alteration, misuse, or damage after sale.

PRO TIPS

Preserve the Product

Do not throw away or repair the product, packaging, or any parts, and keep receipts, manuals, and accessories together in a safe place. Storing the item without altering it allows engineers to inspect the exact condition and may reveal a design or manufacturing issue. Photograph serial numbers, damage, and the surrounding scene, then limit handling so no one can claim later that changes occurred after the incident.

Document Everything

Create a timeline with dates for purchase, first use, the incident, and medical treatment, and save messages with sellers or manufacturers. Take clear photos of injuries, the product in use, and any warnings or labels so there is a visual record of what you saw. Ask witnesses to write down what they observed while memories are fresh, and keep medical bills and employment records organized in one folder.

Watch the Deadlines

Legal time limits apply, and in New Mexico some deadlines may be as short as three years from the date of injury, though other timelines can apply. Evidence can disappear quickly, so talking with a lawyer early helps identify what to preserve and who to notify. Calendar key dates and follow through on appointments so your claim stays on track from the outset.

Comparing Legal Paths for Defective Products

When Full Representation Makes Sense:

Severe Injuries and Complex Evidence

Serious injuries often involve complicated questions about product design, testing, and medical causation that benefit from a coordinated strategy. Full representation brings together investigation, expert analysis, and case management to organize records, protect the product, and prepare persuasive presentations. When the stakes include long-term care, lost earning capacity, and future medical needs, a comprehensive approach helps ensure the full scope of harm is documented and clearly explained.

Multiple Defendants or Jurisdictions

Many product cases involve manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and component suppliers, sometimes located in different states or countries. Coordinating claims across the supply chain requires careful attention to contracts, indemnity, and insurance coverage, as well as the proper forum for the dispute. Comprehensive representation helps manage deadlines, service of process, and discovery obligations so that no critical party or document is overlooked.

When Limited Help May Work:

Minor Injuries with Clear Liability

If injuries resolve quickly and liability appears straightforward, a streamlined claim with strong documentation can sometimes lead to an efficient resolution. Organized medical records, proof of purchase, and photographs may be enough to present a clear demand. Limited assistance focused on claim packaging and negotiation can reduce costs while still protecting your right to be heard.

Small Claims and Warranty Remedies

For low-dollar property damage or limited out-of-pocket expenses, small claims court or a warranty remedy may be appropriate. Saving receipts, repair estimates, and communications with the seller can streamline the process and support your position. Guidance on forms and evidence can help you present the essentials without the complexity of full litigation.

Common Defective Product Scenarios in New Mexico

Automotive Part Failures

Defective tires, airbags, braking components, or fuel systems can lead to loss of vehicle control, severe collisions, or fires, often leaving little time for a driver to react before harm occurs. Preserving the vehicle, event data, and components allows investigators to determine whether a design choice, batch defect, or missing warning contributed to the crash and to identify the responsible companies in the supply chain.

Dangerous Drugs or Devices

Medications and medical devices may carry unanticipated side effects or mechanical failures that cause additional injury rather than relief, particularly when risks are not adequately disclosed to patients or clinicians. Pharmacy records, implant labels, and treating provider notes can link exposure to outcomes, while regulatory filings and post-market reports may shed light on what the manufacturer knew and when.

Household Appliances and Electronics

Kitchen appliances, batteries, chargers, and consumer electronics can overheat, spark, or shock users when circuits, materials, or safeguards fail during ordinary use, resulting in burns, smoke inhalation, or property damage. Securing the device, packaging, and proof of purchase enables testing that may reveal manufacturing deviations or safer alternative designs that could have prevented the incident.

Albuquerque Product Liability Lawyer

Why Hire Pofahl Law Firm, P.C. for a Product Liability Claim

At Pofahl Law Firm, P.C., we handle product liability claims with a focus on thorough investigation, practical strategy, and attentive client service. We work closely with you to understand how the product failed, preserve evidence, and document the medical and financial impact on your life. Our team coordinates with engineers and healthcare providers when needed, and we communicate with insurers and manufacturers to advance your claim efficiently. From the first conversation, we aim to reduce stress by explaining the process, identifying next steps, and keeping you informed about developments. You will always know where your case stands and why.

Every case is unique, and our advice is tailored to your goals, whether you prefer an early negotiation or are prepared to move toward litigation. We prepare matters carefully so that demand letters, settlement discussions, and court filings are supported by clear facts and strong documentation. Our Albuquerque office is accessible to clients across New Mexico, and consultations are available by phone at (505) 720-1030. We welcome questions about timelines, costs, and what you can expect at each stage. When you are ready, we are here to listen and help you chart a path forward.

Schedule a Free Case Review

People Also Search For

product liability attorney New Mexico

Albuquerque product defect lawyer

defective product claim NM

strict liability New Mexico

manufacturing defect lawsuit

design defect attorney

failure to warn claim

personal injury law firm Albuquerque

Related Services

FAQS

What is product liability under New Mexico law?

Product liability is a body of law that holds manufacturers, distributors, and sellers responsible when defective products cause injury. In New Mexico, a claim can be based on strict liability, negligence, or breach of warranty. Strict liability focuses on the condition of the product, while negligence examines conduct such as design choices, testing, or warnings. Warranty theories address promises made about the product’s safety or performance. The type of claim you bring will shape the evidence needed and the defenses that may arise. Common defects include unsafe designs that affect every unit, manufacturing errors that impact specific items, and inadequate warnings that leave users unaware of hidden risks. Proving a claim often requires engineering analysis, quality documents, and medical records linking the defect to the harm. If you were injured by a product in ordinary use, you may have legal options to seek recovery for losses. An early consultation can help you understand the best path for your situation.

How long do I have to file a product liability claim in New Mexico?

Time limits apply to product liability cases, and in New Mexico many personal injury claims must be filed within three years from the date of injury. Other deadlines may apply depending on the parties involved, the nature of the claim, or whether the product was sold by a government entity. Because evidence can change and notices may be required, waiting to investigate can make a case more difficult. Speaking with a lawyer promptly helps identify all relevant timelines. Some claims may also be affected by warranty periods, contract terms, or statutes that shorten or extend the time to act. Additionally, claims on behalf of minors or estates may follow different rules. The safest approach is to assume the shortest potentially applicable deadline and begin gathering records immediately. A timely evaluation can preserve the product, secure witness statements, and ensure all filings are made before the window to bring a claim closes.

What compensation can I seek in a product liability case?

Compensation in product liability cases typically aims to make the injured person whole by addressing medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Depending on the facts, damages may include costs for surgeries, rehabilitation, medications, and medical devices, along with mileage and home care needs. If injuries affect your ability to work, claims can include lost income and reduced earning capacity. Property damage, such as a destroyed vehicle or household items, may also be recoverable. Future damages are important when injuries require ongoing care or create lasting limitations. In those situations, life-care planning and economic analysis can help estimate future medical costs and wage losses. New Mexico law may also permit recovery of loss of consortium and other non-economic harms. Every case is different, and the value depends on the strength of the evidence, the severity of the injuries, and how the defect caused the harm. Clear documentation supports a fair resolution.

Do I need to keep the defective product?

Yes. Keeping the product, all parts, the packaging, manuals, and receipts is extremely important. Do not attempt to fix, test, or use the product again. Store it in a safe place and avoid making changes that could alter its condition. Photos of the item, serial numbers, and the scene can further support your claim. If you must move the product, document how it was stored and handled so its chain of custody is clear. If the seller or manufacturer asks for the product, talk with a lawyer before releasing it. In many cases, arrangements can be made for an agreed inspection where both sides have an opportunity to examine and test the item under controlled conditions. This preserves the evidence and reduces disputes about later alterations. Maintaining the product in its post-incident state allows qualified engineers to determine whether a defect existed and how it contributed to the injury.

How is a product defect proven?

Proving a defect usually involves a combination of technical and factual evidence. Engineers may conduct testing, examine materials, and compare the product to design specifications and industry standards. Investigators review quality-control records, supplier documents, and prior incident reports to identify patterns. Photos, videos, and witness statements about how the product was used can help show what happened. Medical evidence connects the product failure to the injuries sustained. Sometimes direct proof of a specific defect is unavailable because the product was destroyed in the incident. In those cases, circumstantial evidence, such as the product’s unexpected behavior under normal use, can support the claim. Courts may consider whether reasonable alternative designs existed that would have reduced the risk. The key is preserving as much evidence as possible early, including the product, packaging, purchase records, and any communications with the seller or manufacturer. Thorough documentation builds a clearer picture of what went wrong and why.

Can I bring a claim if I misused the product?

It depends on the nature of the misuse and whether it was foreseeable. Manufacturers are not responsible for every conceivable use, but they should anticipate common ways consumers might handle the product. If a misuse was minor or predictable and adequate warnings were missing, you may still have a viable claim. Conversely, extreme or unintended uses can weaken a case by breaking the chain of causation. Each situation turns on its facts, including the instructions, labels, and marketing materials provided. Photos, messages, and witness accounts of how the product was used can help clarify whether the use was foreseeable. Even if you think you did something wrong, you should not assume you have no claim. New Mexico law may consider comparative fault, which can reduce damages according to responsibility rather than prevent recovery entirely.

Who can be held responsible for a defective product?

Potentially responsible parties can include the product’s manufacturer, component suppliers, distributors, and retailers. Liability follows the supply chain, and responsibility depends on where the defect entered the stream of commerce. For example, a parts supplier may be implicated if a subassembly failed, while a retailer may be responsible under certain warranty theories. Identifying all involved entities helps ensure insurance coverage and contractual indemnities are properly considered. In some cases, third parties such as maintenance providers or installers may also share responsibility if their work contributed to the hazard. Determining who did what, and when, requires careful review of purchase records, invoices, manuals, and communications. The goal is to map the product’s path from design to your hands. Once responsible parties are identified, your claim can be presented to the appropriate insurers, which can streamline negotiations and reduce the risk of missed defendants.

What if a recall was issued after my injury?

A recall can be helpful evidence, but it is not required to prove a product was defective. Recalls often follow incident data and manufacturer investigations, and they may confirm that other consumers experienced similar problems. If a recall exists, keep copies of the notice, the recall number, and any instructions you received. However, even without a recall, strong evidence of a defect and causation can support a claim. If your injury happened before the recall, the timing may be relevant to what the company knew or should have known. If it happened after a recall, the adequacy of the warning and corrective steps can be important. In either scenario, you should not return or alter the product until you receive legal guidance on preserving evidence. Coordinating any inspection or remedy through your lawyer can protect your rights while addressing safety concerns.

Will my product liability case go to court or settle?

Most product liability cases resolve through negotiation or mediation, but some proceed to trial when the parties disagree on liability or damages. Settlement depends on the strength of the evidence, the clarity of causation, and the risk assessment on both sides. Preparing a case as if it may be tried helps position it for meaningful settlement discussions because the facts are organized and ready to present. Litigation involves formal discovery, depositions, and court deadlines, which can take time. Although going to court can be stressful, it may be the best path when fair offers are not forthcoming. Your lawyer will discuss options at each stage, including opportunities for mediation or arbitration. Throughout the process, clear communication helps you weigh the benefits and risks of settlement versus trial so you can make informed decisions.

How much does it cost to hire a product liability lawyer?

Many product liability lawyers handle cases on a contingency fee, meaning you do not pay attorney’s fees unless there is a recovery. Case expenses for experts, filing fees, and discovery are typically advanced by the firm and reimbursed from any recovery, though arrangements vary. You should discuss percentages, costs, and what happens if there is no recovery before signing an agreement. Clear terms help you understand the financial aspects from the start. Initial consultations are often free, allowing you to learn about your options without upfront cost. During that discussion, the firm can explain how fees and expenses would apply to your case and what steps are recommended next. If a contingency arrangement is offered, you will receive a written agreement outlining responsibilities and timelines. Asking questions about costs is appropriate and encouraged so you can move forward comfortably and confidently.

Product Liability Lawyer in New Mexico

Accountability After Defects

New Mexico Product Liability Guide

Why Product Liability Matters in New Mexico

About Pofahl Law Firm, P.C. and Brady Pofahl

Understanding New Mexico Product Liability Claims

Need More Information?